The Denver Westword Blog



Add to Technorati Favorites

Blogroll

Rocky Reverses Caucus Ban For Employees

Tue Feb 05, 2008 at 09:36:36 AM

raised%20hand.JPG

Here it is: Super Tuesday, February 5, when politically active Coloradoans will gather to caucus in greater numbers than ever before. And thanks to an eleventh hour agreement with the Denver Newspaper Guild, Rocky Mountain News employees will be able to join them in a personal rather than professional capacity.

This January 30 More Messages blog includes a memo from Rocky editor/publisher/president John Temple that's hard to misinterpret. "Because caucuses are party activities that involve expressing your political position in public, you should not attend them, unless you’re covering them for the Rocky," he wrote. In the days that followed, the Denver Newspaper Guild raised objections to this dictate, as well as to a less sweeping one issued by Denver Post editor Greg Moore that can be accessed here. "We found that there is a state law that appears to prevent employers from precluding employees from participating in caucuses," Guild representative Tony Mulligan said -- and after some back and forth, the Post's Moore modified his policy in a note published in a February 4 More Messages item. At that time, the Rocky's Temple still hadn't capitulated, but he subsequently did so in a memo that portrays his previous missive as a mere suggestion rather than an order -- spin worthy of any serious presidential candidate.

The latest memo reads as follows:

Folks,

As you may know, the Guild has filed a grievance and threatened to file an injunction against the News over the memo I sent out about the caucuses. The guild is citing a Colorado law and is contending that the law gives everyone the right to participate in a caucus.

Because neutrality and the absence of the appearance of a conflict in reporting on political events is critical to the credibility of any news organization, my memo was intended to remind employees about the News' ethics policy for journalists. The News did not intend to abridge the rights of its employees; merely to remind everyone of our policy on political activity. To clear up any confusion, if you participate in a caucus, you are doing so in a personal capacity, and cannot hold yourself out during the caucus as an employee of the Rocky Mountain News. Further, if you participate in the caucus, within 48 hours you must notify the newspaper management so it can make future political coverage decisions and protect the integrity of the newspaper.

John Temple

Well done, sir. Give that man a hand. -- Michael Roberts

Category: More Messages

5 Comments:

Bill M says:

This is great. John Temple's latest statement doesn't "clear up any confusion," it factually contradicts his original statement. Oh, and if you need it, here's a translation of the last line:

"Further, if you participate in the caucus, within 48 hours you must notify the newspaper management so it can retaliate under the guise of protecting the integrity of the newspaper."

Bill says:

Oh, and you can better believe there will be retaliation.

Jerry Jones says:

So according to Mr. Temple's reasoning, participating in a caucus permanently and irreversibly damages a reporter's ability to report on politics without bias?

What about all those "closet" political activists? Aren't those who cloak their political leanings more dangerous than those who publicly celebrate their conservatism/liberalism?

It seems to me like the RMN's policy is more of an editorial pissing contest than any real attempt to "protect the journalistic integrity" of the paper.

Who would have thought that educated people who report the news might actually want to participate in the electoral process and take some small measure of control over thier own destinities?

My best advice to the RMN at this point would be to have an attorney review all of your company policies for other possible infringements. And be more careful when writing policies that impose limits on employees' Constitutional rights -- unless you enjoy defending yourself from lawsuits.

jnew says:

As someone who knew, admired and worked for Temple, I am disappointed in his spin doctoring and his ability to sweep away the rights of his employees to vote and to give so little credit to them for their ethics.

Victor E. Rojo says:

There's a pretty simple way to avoid all this nonsense: Divulge, don't conceal. Newspapers demand transparency of other institutions but don't walk the walk.

Post and Rocky, how about breaking down for us the political affiliations of your staff and then explaining what is done to ensure that their leanings don't translate into biased coverage?

Here's someone who agrees, more or less:

http://www.time-blog.com/tuned_in/2008/02/do_you_want_to_know_who_report.html

Post a comment

Comments may not show up immediately after submission. Please wait a minute after posting a comment for it to appear.




Westword Insiders

  • Local food, music and news blasts
  • Free Stuff