Personhood Amendment: Photos from today's No on 62 rally on the State Capitol steps

• P.S. Margaret Sanger would be extremely happy right now that the pro-death camp has gotten the Latinos involved. After all, her sole mission was, and apparently continues to be, the removal of the minority classes from America.

• @Julie: Last I checked tumors don't have brain waves or beating hearts. And the fetus didn't force itself upon the mother. My kindergartener could school you in the results of sexual behavior. The way I see it is this: people need to wake up and finally realize we are not the sexual beings this world wants us to believe we are. That would make us no better than the animals. Rather, we need to realize we're spiritual beings made in the likeness of God. Oh, wait. That would mean we have to convert our hearts back to Him to who made us. I continue to pray for the pro-death camp and feel reinvigorated every time I hear their angry cries. Sin is corruption. Repent. @Mitchell: well said!

• So what part of the Christian mythos should we legislate next? Can we execute children for sassing back to their parents <i> Leviticus 20:9 NLT and Proverbs 20:20 NAB </i>)? How about we start using the state to execute those who worship the 'wrong' God <i>Exodus 22:19 NAB and 2 Chronicles 15:12-13 NAB</i>? How about we institute laws requiring rape victims to marry their rapists <i>Deuteronomy 22:28-29 NLT</I>? Come on guys, don't you know the bible is the source of all true morality???

• Yes, wise Julie. If you are building a house, and it has been framed, and roofed, then I could certainly justify burning it down, without consequences (since there is no such thing as an unbuilt house!) And I'm sure you believe that 36 week fetusues could be cut out and killed without consequences as well, as they cannot be "anthropomorphized." (no human qualities). No dictionary needed, just common sense and consistency in thought and logic.

• "Persons not property" (... Unless they're women, right?) Theses antis just try so hard to anthrpomorphise fetuses and impose upon them personal qualities they simply don't have. What's next, tumors? There's no such thing as an "unborn baby" any more than there can be an unbuilt house. Abortion isn't murder and anyone who thinks that it is needs a dictionary. Since when does anything, person or not, have any rights to force themselves upon the body of another against their will? A mentality accepting of this is not unlike that of a rapist. If abortion ever does get banned women will die by the thousands. Annually. And the blood of every last one will be on the hands of the enemies of freedom and human decency who do not deserve to call themselves "pro-life." I'll vote for sanity and morality. I'll vote NO on 62

• Cheryl, So ones living conditions post-birth justify murder pre-birth? Lets take it a step farther... what if the parents dive into poverty within the first two years of the childs life? Well, the kid doesn't really understand the world yet, or even know whats going on, so why not just shove a sharpened vacuum hose into juniors head and end it all so he's not POOR. You WRETCHED sick individual. Who are YOU to judge what a life would be worth based on income and circumstances?

• I guess Jesus really liked welfare babies destined to grow up in perpetual poverty ?

• UPDATE: We just got off the phone with Rev. Dawn Riley Duval and she was unwilling to do a 15 min. radio interview.

• I think you're confused, Dave. Opponents of 62 are those who, as you say, think it goes too far, etc. Those who favor 62 are the anti-choice activists featured on the first page of pics. If you click next at the bottom you get the pics of the anti-62 people.

• How is it that the only pictures with this story are from the opponents of Amendment 62? Where are the pictures of those who think this amendment goes too far and places a religious definition of life in the state constitution? I guess we're just not as exotic.

• Why does it say it's a flier of an aborted fetus when it's clearly a picture of a living unborn baby? (That particular picture is a 7-week baby.)

• Hello Jo Scott. I am Rev. Dawn Riley Duval. Interesting thing - our church administrative assistant has no record of anyone calling to invite me on a radio show. Nice try Jo. Enjoy your night.

• Called Rev. Duval's church to invite her on a radio show today. She's not a Reverend. She's a fraud. Bummer.

TotalComments: 13