Top

blog

Stories

 

Gas-drilling oversight bill killed by the House: What's the fracking point?

roan wellpads.jpg
Gas well pads.
A bill that sought to increase the reporting process for water-quality complaints related to oil and gas drilling in Colorado died quietly at the statehouse yesterday, with Republican lawmakers insisting that the industry's use of hydraulic fracturing fluids, or "fracking," poses no threat to groundwater. But the measure also drew heat from the other side of the aisle for not going far enough to protect citizens from the mysterious, highly toxic fluids energy companies use to extract oil and gas.

The proposal put forth by Representative Roger Wilson, a Western Slope Democrat, was certainly modest enough. House Bill 1172 would have required the Colorado Oil and Gas Commission to make regular reports to the legislature concerning the complaints it receives regarding drilling operations in the state, a reporting process that was dropped last year. It would also have required the COGC and the state health department to review an upcoming EPA study of the effects of fracking and report back on its findings -- kind of like a homework assignment for bureaucrats.

But other lawmakers didn't see much point in all this relaying of complaints and studies. To the drill-baby-drill crowd, Wilson's bill seems superfluous; to those who suspect there might be problems with fracking contamination, a bland absolution from the oil and gas commission wouldn't be persuasive in any case.

Some western states have taken a more aggressive stance toward fracking, which has been vilified in Vanity Fairand the activist documentary Gasland. Last fall, Wyoming became the first state to require drilling companies to disclose what's in the proprietary blend of chemicals they pump into the ground to force gas and oil to the surface.

Industry representatives maintain that there's no solid evidence that the fracking process itself has contaminated groundwater (though there are documented cases of surface spills involving the fluids). But they're not eager to talk about the chemicals involved, either.

As for the EPA study and the complaints logged with the oil and gas commission -- lawmakers can still read about such things on their own, even if no one is formally assigning the homework.

More from our Follow That Story archive: "Ken Salazar's role in BP disaster: More spin than reform?"


Sponsor Content

My Voice Nation Help
2 comments
Eric
Eric

This very Bill proposal/death in chambers capsulizes the gridlock paralyzing our legislative process today.

I mean puts it in a nutshell.

The slimy republicans, bought and paid for by the oil and gas industry, and proud of it, went exactly where they were told to go.........lying and distracting, literally telling people fracing doesn't harm our water supply, befoul the rock and soil it affects and contaminate it for miles.

Meanwhile the spineless Democrats, scared of their own shadows, worried they'll be seen as "nanny staters", put up a worthless Bill that the industry would use as toilet paper even if it had passed, and try to tell us they're "trying".

HBO did a documentary on frac"k"ing. Christ on a crutch, there's no debate about it. The usage of this procedure is so destructive it should literally be illegal!

And here we are. republicans lie to your face, and try to discredit frac"k"ing's victims, call the studies and data comdemning it "biased" and shill for the business interests that astro turfed them into power. Democrats just wilt and collapse, too cowardly to represent those of us who voted them in.

What a mess.

Now Trending

Denver Concert Tickets

Around The Web

From the Vault

 

Loading...