Rollie Heath on Proposition 103, which would hike taxes to raise money for schools

Categories: News, Politics

rollie heath.jpg
Rollie Heath.
Pushing a tax hike during difficult economic times might seem like the political equivalent of a suicide mission. But Senator Rollie Heath has taken on the challenge anyway -- and this week, Proposition 103, which would earmark the extra funds for schools, was officially approved for the November ballot. Moreover, he says the petitioning process suggests that there's a lot of support for the idea. "There was an overwhelming response to it," he says, "which was a pleasant surprise."

As explained on BrightColorado.com, the campaign's website, the measure, previously known as Initiative 25, would raise Colorado sales tax from 2.9 percent to 3 percent, and its personal and corporate tax from 4.63 percent to 5 percent -- rates that would remain in place for five years. The site says these numbers correspond to tax levels "throughout the economic boom of the 1990s."

Proposition 103 would generate an estimated $536 million per annum toward public education funding, with the cost for a taxpayer making $55,700 being around $150 a year, according to BrightColorado.com.

That may not sound like much -- but these days, every penny counts for people at every income level. Nevertheless, Heath says the number of people who stepped up to help gather signatures was "phenomenal. I think we had 657 volunteer petitioners, on top of paid petitioners, which is a huge number. People kept contacting me, saying, 'May I carry the petition?' I'd be at farmer's markets and people would say, 'I'd like to carry petitions, too.'"

In regard to the timing of this pitch, Heath doesn't think it's actually good from the perspective of curing our fiscal ills. "The only way we're going to get out of this is to grow jobs," he maintains. "And you can't grow jobs without having an educated work force. I've spent forty years in business in this state, running both of Johns Mansville's major subsidiaries and starting business of my own. And I can tell you this: You don't attract people unless you have an educated work force. And it's going to be very difficult to attract people if you're not investing in education."

Already, opponents of the measure are speaking out. Take WhoSaidYouSaid.com, whose home page's top four items at this writing are all attacks on Proposition 103. And look for another one soon: WhoSaidYouSaid's Kelly Maher recently posted a video to YouTube in which a petition gatherer can be heard mischaracterizing the measure. To watch it, click here.

Heath also knows the Independence Institute isn't a fan, since he's already debated the organization's Ben DeGrow on two occasions -- and there's always the possibility that well-heeled anti-tax types will finance a massive effort to defeat the proposition. If so, Heath says, "we'll do the only thing we can do, which is work very well and very hard and rely on the grassroots. That's what got us 142,000 signatures" -- more than enough to guarantee its ballot placement -- "from parents and grandparents and business owners who understand how important it is to educate folks. We're going to rely on that. We're not going to change anything.

"My absolute dream," he adds, "is that Colorado bucks a trend and invests in education. I think that's the best headline we could possibly have."

More from our Politics archive: "Doug Lamborn's Barack Obama-tar baby remark: Intentionally racist or harmless?"

My Voice Nation Help
11 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Valery Brown
Valery Brown

Let's get real, here: Michael Bennet (the Education Senator with all the 'private sector' experience) got DPS into a very bad 'structured' deal with investments, and the public is losing millions.

Money for schools cannot--will never--take the place of families who care about their children's educations.

I shall also quote Mr. Chase, in his comment:"Our curricula are not being dumbed down because of a lack of money (rather, it took deliberate effort and money to dumb them down), and there is no reason to suppose that a funding increase would improve them." We cannot and should never blame the two abovementioned failings on teachers.

How much of the public's dollars--and tax increases-- will be going to non-academic programs like school breakfasts, lunches (dinners?).

The system--and curriculum-- needs reform from top to bottom.

Michael Roberts
Michael Roberts

Strong take, Valery. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

Robert Chase
Robert Chase

I like to be quoted, but I hope that I am not misunderstood.  I approve of providing breakfast and lunch at school to those who need it, and there is good reason to believe that such programs aid learning.  They are not the primary responsibility of schools though, nor is fixing the "achievement gap".  Our apparent expectation that all students can/should/will attain a diploma has utterly distorted debate about public education and poisoned educational policy -- our schools' problems pale in comparison with parents' and society's neurotic self-delusion!

Some alternative, vocational, semi-academic programs conferring something other than a high school diploma (and something more than a certificate of attendance) must be developed, and students permitted to add accreditation in units -- competence in 9th and 12th grade levels of English and mathematics, e.g.  Programs that attempt to remediate failure should not be halted, but schools' emphasis must be on achievement -- it should go without saying that maintaining among the cohort of students expected to graduate those lacking ninth grade competence is intolerable.  Concern for low graduation rates is misplaced if (as is in fact the case) the certification itself is so compromised that it cannot be used as a meaningful measure of competence.

Robert Chase
Robert Chase

Sales taxes are regressive -- raise property or income taxes instead.

Colorado does need to invest in education, but who says that's what's taking place in our schools?  DPS has spent a considerable amount of money falsifying student achievement, and incompetence rates among graduates exceed 50%.  I cannot support funding increases for public schools as long as their focus remains on increasing graduation rates at the expense of teaching.

We have made of our schools socialization programs -- which may be direly needed -- but they are not imparting academic knowledge adequately.  Our curricula are not being dumbed down because of a lack of money (rather, it took deliberate effort and money to dumb them down), and there is no reason to suppose that a funding increase would improve them.  As long as we insist on regarding students as little consumers exercising choice in some sort of marketplace of ideas, public schools will continue to spiral down the toilet.

Joker Marchant
Joker Marchant

I would vote for a designated tax to add, repair, replace, upgrade, and modernize roads and highways throughout this state.  The surface infrastructure in Colorado is in very woeful condition, and is really obsolete in many places.  Highways and roads throughout the Front Range and mountains lack capacity for the volume of traffic traveling on them and are marked widespread safety hazards; and the situation in eastern and other rural parts of Colorado is nothing short of pathetic and shameful. Colorado is clearly at disadvantage competitively with neighboring states and rival regional metro areas when it comes to have a surface transportation system that works.  Employers and business are not going to relocate here with the current and near future surface infrastructure we possess, so why would we need to spend more on education when quality jobs in Colorado are not going to increase.

Mike
Mike

The teabagger idiots here in COLO SPGS are in full apoplexy over this communist plot to steal their money to waste it on liberal union pukes and fellow travelers. Sales of bullets have soared and they're laying in supplies to survive the coming apocalyptic epoch if this passes.

Vill Robinson
Vill Robinson

The fact that the Independence Institute opposes this is a blessing, given how Caldara has been bitch-slapped on ballot issues with tedious regularity for about the last 15 years. And why do you even reference the village idiot Kelly Maher? Do you have any idea how small the traffic to that site is? Christ, if you're going to cite opponents cite some potentially meaningful ones.

Michael Roberts
Michael Roberts

A strong post, as always. Thanks for weighing in, Vill.

Eric
Eric

Bless your heart, Rollie.

This is teabag frenzy incurring courage, and it couldn't come at a better time.

Too many Democrats cower before the conservative republican "I've got mine, you go screw yourself" philosophy and mantr mantra, and Senator Heath is an example of a principled man that doesn't.

Education privatization, demonizing of teachers, outright stifling of the public education system and the theft of tax money for religious and private schools are threatening to undermine the inherrent right of every Colorado student to a quality education.

Rollie Heath is a hero. 

Michael Roberts
Michael Roberts

Interesting post, Eric -- one we're going to make an upcoming Comment of the Day. Much appreciated.

From the Vault

 

©2013 Denver Westword, LLC, All rights reserved.
Loading...