Foreclosure: Initiative 84 dies to make way for a legislative bill

foreclosure sign wikimedia.jpg
Initiative 84, a proposed ballot measure that would have reformed the state's foreclosure process, is effectively dead -- but it will enter a third life in the next legislative session. Five weeks before 87,000 signatures were due at the Secretary of State's office -- and with only 25,000 in the bag -- sponsors at the Colorado Progressive Coalition rerouted their resources to a more hopeful option: The Colorado Legislature. This will be the second time the CPC has pushed a foreclosure measure: Earlier this year, House Bill 1156 died before making it to the full chamber.

Supported by Representative Beth McCann and Senator Michael Johnston, HB 1156 targeted transparency inside the system. Organizers hoped to effectively reverse a 2006 law that made it legal for lawyers to sign as proof that lenders meet the requirements to foreclose on a property; instead, the bill would have required proof of ownership via paperwork, and it sought to establish a standard of judicial oversight, requiring a judge to read that paperwork before making a ruling in any foreclosure hearing.

But 1156 died in committee in April: Critics complained that it was another law directed at foreclosure reform in a line that already had too many, and they went so far as to target its sponsor, the CPC. They suggested that a group with fewer such proposals might have earned a more positive response, despite the fact that HB 1156 marked the CPC's first foreclosure effort.

Not anymore. After the death of HB 1156 the CPC expanded its strategy, pushing a proposal to amend the Colorado Constitution.

foreclosure thinkstock photo.jpg
With Initiative 84, which would also have required proof of ownership before foreclosure, the group and other members of its Campaign to End Unjust Foreclosure hoped to let the people vote on the matter, not legislators. But the initiative required a minimum of 87,000 signatures of support before it could make a statewide ballot, and at the end of June, after several battles with opposition, only 25,000 had been secured. Early in the group's efforts, sponsors planned to hire outside firms to assist with the collection of signatures, but the funds to do so never came through.

"It was taking a significant amount of our time and money," CPC Economic Justice Director Corrine Fowler says. "We were expending a significant amount of resources on this ballot initiative. We talked to our coalition partners and Representative McCann, and we realized that gathering 25,000 signatures is enough civic engagement that we can cover ourselves in the legislature."

So next legislative session, the group will start the third round of this fight with its second bill proposal. Although the first attempt ended quickly, Fowler says awareness of local foreclosures has increased in the intervening months -- and so has support to stop them. The CPC continues to collect new stories every week, she says, and its partners in the Colorado House and Senate feel more confident in a bill's potential for success this time.

"With 1156, the problem was so hidden and difficult to define, and nobody in the state knew this was happening," says Fowler. But while she believes that has changed, she remains skeptical about some elements of statutory reform: "I still have my concerns that statutory changes are not permanent, so I hope we can ring a very strong bell. I hope we don't have to continue to protect the people of Colorado year after year, which has always been the problem with statutory change. Because the banks will continue to oppose us with all of their might."

In the meantime, the CPC will continue to work with Debra Fortenberry and Stephen Brunette, the Colorado Springs attorneys who drafted HB 1156, as they create new language. Fowler hopes to adapt the new bill to include greater accountability, including punishments for financial institutions that process loans fraudulently. "I'd like to make it even stronger than the initiative, which was very simple," she says. "We have a lot of time to explore that."

More from our Politics archive: "Foreclosure: Initiative 84 passes latest hurdle with Supreme Court's okay."

My Voice Nation Help
5 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Revolving_Door
Revolving_Door

It's about time.  The mortgage lenders have made a profitable practice of questionable business ethics.  The economy has hit the middle class very hard.  The state had a huge victory against the mortgage companies in the National bank settlement.  Unfortunately the state, has done little to help distressed home owners whom they would not have won if not for their suffering and injustice.  The state has set up farce straw men agencies such as HUD & Colorado foreclosure hotline to filter award money into that do little other that budget counseling.  There is NO ONE holding the mortgage companies accountable.  The state has the distressed homeowner call the mortgage lender to seek assistance with programs that have been funded through law suit settlements.  Really call the lender for help?  Isn't that a little like keeping the fox in charge of the hen house?  If legislature isn't past there is NOTHING, NOWHERE NOHOW to protect the distressed homeowner.  Don't forget the lenders were given billions of federal money specifically for that purpose and they continue to with hold federal funded money for the purpose for which it was intended.

DavidJones
DavidJones

Foreclosure defense and loan modification assistance is a popular new business due to the economy.

Donkey Hotay
Donkey Hotay

Pay your bills, deadbeat, and they won't seize the collateral.

Robert Chase
Robert Chase like.author.displayName 1 Like

Lenders have taken advantage of Colorado's lax laws to steal hundreds of homes, and your reaction is to tell people to pay their mortgages on time?  Let me guess; your daddy is in the foreclosure business!

Donkey Hotay
Donkey Hotay

-- How to Avoid Foreclosure -- 1) Pay Your Mortgage on Time, as agreed. hth.

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

Loading...