Colorado ballots are traceable, unconstitutional, voters group claims

Categories: Politics

Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for marilyn marks.jpg
Marilyn Marks
A Colorado voter advocacy group has filed a lawsuit against the Colorado Secretary of State and six county clerks, arguing that ballots in the current system are traceable -- violating voters' right to secret, anonymous ballots.

This flaw, the group says, exposes Coloradans to voter intimidation and could discourage people from casting their ballots.

But the county clerks deny there are threats to voter privacy and say the allegations put forward by activist Marilyn Marks are not true.

"It's an absolutely fundamental right that we have to a secret ballot," says Marks, the founder and president of Citizen Center, a nonpartisan, nonprofit group that focuses on accountability and transparency in elections. "If we start thinking about what happens if we lose that right...voters can be intimidated. Voters may stay away from polls. Voters can't vote their conscience. That's such an undemocratic proposition. We just cannot let that happen."

Here's the problem, according to Marks: Election staff can trace specific ballots right back to voters through unique barcodes assigned to each ballot.

Ballot example, bar code, Marilyn Marks.jpg
Courtesy of Marilyn Marks
Example of a unique barcode on a ballot in Chaffee County
The example she gives is that a boss who wants employees to vote for a certain candidate could require that all employees hand over their unique barcode numbers from their ballots. The boss could then send those numbers to a friend within the elections office who could confirm whether the employees actually voted the way they said they would.

She says she thinks these barcodes exist as an auditing tool, but that it ultimately makes information available to insiders that needs to remain private.

"You are never supposed to be able to do that," she says. "There are longstanding laws to keep you from doing that."

A spokesman for the Secretary of State referred us to the six county clerks also mentioned in the lawsuit, which are Boulder, Chafee, Eagle, Jefferson, Larimer and Mesa.

We were able to reach Eagle County Clerk and Recorder Teak Simonton, who said she couldn't comment in-depth because the lawsuit is ongoing, but she did send us the county clerk's joint motions to dismiss the complaint, one filed in June and another filed at the end of July.

"The counties who are involved with this strongly disagree with her concerns," says Simonton. "It is our assertion...that the serial numbers are not a voter."

She says that the process is secure. And another argument in the county clerk's motions is that because the Citizen Center is not alleging that clerks have actually traced ballots or ever threatened to do so, the case is based on "theoretical harms" and thus not legitimate.

Marks says that misses the point.

"They are claiming that there is no harm because no one has ever filed a legal complaint and said...'I've been retaliated again,'" she says. "We are saying it's harm enough when voters know the government can trace their ballot.... It has a chilling effect on the willingness to go vote."

The county clerks also argue that the right to election procedures that make it impossible for a clerk to identify how an individual voted is not a fundamental right protected by the U.S. Constitution.

Marks, though, says that the right to a secret ballot is clearly stated in Colorado's state constitution. She also sent us a document that shows that members of the military who vote from overseas through a fax, for example, have to waive their right to a secret ballot, which she says implies that this is a right that people do have.

Ultimately, she says, the current system could discourage voters, which is her greatest concern. "Will they go to the polls if they know the government can trace their votes?"

More from our Politics archive: Scott Gessler is rewriting rules, weakening disclosure laws, says Colorado Ethics Watch

Follow Sam Levin on Twitter at @SamTLevin. E-mail the author at

Sponsor Content

My Voice Nation Help
rockiesfever topcommenter

Obama V. Obama: Listing the President's Flip-FlopsMitt Romney's Not the Only One with a Long ListThales, Yahoo! Contributor Network Nov 30, 2011 "Share your voice on Yahoo! websites. Start Here."More:2008PolitifactStrategic Petroleum ReserveThe ObamasWomens History Month tweetPrintFlagPost a commentThe Democratic National Committee (DNC) has come out with a commercial (dubbed "Mitt v. Mitt") cataloguing the flip-flops and inconsistent positions of former Gov. Mitt Romney. This is entirely fair for them to do. But it's also entirely fair to do the same with respect to President Barack Obama. So, here we go, "Obama v. Obama" on elections, health care, defense, taxes and spending, energy, civility, and other topics. (Warning: This list is not intended to be a comprehensive account of all Obama's flip-flops. It's just the first few dozen I could come up with off the top of my head and with the help of PolitiFact.) ELECTIONS & VOTING RECORD Obama's presidential run began with a flip-flop. In November 2004, after being elected to the U.S. Senate, Obama insisted that he would not run for President in 2008, calling the idea "silly". In 2007, Obama pledged to seek public financing for his presidential campaign. In 2008, he rejected public financing, even though his opponent -- Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) -- accepted public financing. In 2010, Obama decried senate candidate Scott Brown's (R-MA) record of voting with Republicans 96% of the time, saying it showed Brown was not "independent". When he himself was in the senate, Obama voted with Democrats 96% of the time.


Juan_Leg topcommenter

They have the audacity to take everything in their limits to it's extremes, and then cry and do all they can to overt the situation where they are CLEARLY in the wrong.

Accountability does NOT exist beyond the common man. Sherri's soliciting children w/ meth, officer's driving over 140 mph, senseless chases by law enforcement causing INNOCENT fatalities, avoidable shootings, dept celebrate civilian beatings,ect.......I could definitely continue, but I am more than sure my point is getting across.

I support ANY & ALL organizations that keep those cheating, lying bastards on their toes !

Nice work Marlyn Marks and the best of luck to you and your supporters !

Now Trending

Denver Concert Tickets

From the Vault