Medical marijuana dispensary closure threat letters in Colorado echoed in Washington

washington dea matthew barnes.jpg
Matthew Barnes.
For the last eight months or so, the U.S. Attorney's Office in Colorado has been shutting down medical marijuana storefronts within 1,000 feet of schools by simply sending the dispensaries a letter and giving them 45 days to vacate or face possible seizure of their property and assets.

The tactic must be viewed as successful, because last week, a federal agency in Washington state issued similar letters to 23 dispensaries near schools, ordering them to discontinue business.



The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration is taking the reins in Washington -- not the U.S. Attorney assigned to the state. On Thursday, the DEA notified owners of the aforementioned dispensaries that their businesses were within 1,000 feet of a school, playground or "prohibited area," and warned them that they had thirty days to "discontinue the sale and/or distribution of marijuana at the above referenced location."



On the surface, the language in these letters is similar to that used by Colorado U.S. Attorney John Walsh, in that they seem to leave open the possibility of dispensaries relocating elsewhere.

But the Washington action goes a step further. Copies of the letters are also going to landlords of the dispensaries -- a move the DEA apparently hopes will chill a growing industry by reminding property owners that the government can and will seize their land for aiding a federally criminal enterprise.

In a release announcing the current action, DEA special agent Matthew Barnes states, "I am confident that once notified of the ramifications and penalties associated with renting a property for marijuana distribution purposes, property owners will take appropriate steps to rectify the situation on their own."



Although the U.S. Attorney's Office didn't send the letters, U.S. Attorney for Western Washington Jenny Durkan offers her own explanation for the action in the same statement. And by her own, we mean the exact same that the feds have been using for years: "We all work hard to create a safe zone for kids in school," she says. "There is a reason that both federal and state laws prohibit sales of marijuana in school zones. We need to enforce one message for our students: drugs have no place in or near our schools."

More from our Marijuana archive: "Medical marijuana: Ten dispensaries targeted in third wave of U.S. Attorney closure letters" and "Marijuana: Amendment 64 support letter signed by more than 100 college professors."

My Voice Nation Help
7 comments
Mitch Siff
Mitch Siff

Alaska has been "legal" for years...Go to www.norml and look it up. You don't see any problems there with the feds.

Monkey
Monkey

It's funny to me when people think any of these letters "leave open the possibility of dispensaries relocating elsewhere." While anything is possible, none of the letters imply moving is an alternative to closing. It's also funny that dispensaries have made the war on marijuana really cheap to fight, they used to spend tax payer money infiltrating, investigating and raiding weed dealers, now they just send a letter. You could say, dispensaries assist prohibitionists, by reducing their cost and allowing them to operate more efficiently.

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

Wait until Colorado adds the "playgrounds and other prohibited areas" -- as defined by federal criminal drug law -- to the mix.

 

It will take out at least another 100 dispensaries ... who obviously had Bozo the Clown as their lawyer or worse, no lawyer at all.

 

.

charlie_oscar
charlie_oscar

Matthew Barnes is a clown...Yep...I said it!

IcePick
IcePick

 @DonkeyHotay I'm a little confused about how bad a job they've done so far.  When I look at the map, available at Tax and Excise in Denver I see a very large number of MMC's which overlap:

1) other MMC's

2) schools

3) daycares

4) parks

5) arcades

 

etc, etc, etc.  Is Walsh so undermanned that he has not had time to pick up the map? And why have none of these MMC's argued entrapment?

Monkey
Monkey

 @DonkeyHotay Hey, I found out CDS and others, in Boulder closed because of federal threats. Remember "jake" who used to come on here and promote regulations. He worked for CDS, I guess the regulations weren't all he claimed them to be.

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

 @Monkey ... Oh the delicious Irony !!

 

He's isn't the only douche-nozzle who openly promoted "regulations and taxes" in a pathetically misguided attempt to "legitimize" his business, only to get gored and eviscerated by the very regulations, restrictions and taxes he begged the government to ram up his ass.

 

Jay Epstein of Boulder Meds begged for and supported Government Regulations as a way to eliminate "undesirables" -- competition -- from the industry, even giving press interviews.

 

The daft dipshit didn't have a clue that when the dust settled the Government Regualtors would consider and label HIM as an undesirable moral lowlife.

 

LOL!

 

http://www.dailycamera.com/ci_18627651

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

Loading...