Scott Gessler rule changes rejected, watchdog groups pleased

Categories: Politics

Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for scott gessler photo cropped small.JPG
Scott Gessler
Secretary of State Scott Gessler wants to make it easier for political groups to remain secretive about their spending by rewriting election rules and weakening disclosure laws. That's according to two watchdog groups, who praise a court ruling that blocks most of Gessler's efforts. Denver District Court has struck down key campaign finance rule changes adopted earlier this year, but the case isn't closed yet: Gessler says he plans to appeal.

The ruling is a win for Colorado Ethics Watch and Colorado Common Cause, which have filed multiple lawsuits accusing Gessler of greatly overstepping his bounds.

"This ruling shouldn't have surprised anyone," says Luis Toro, Ethics Watch's director. "The only question is, is he going to keep on doing this...making people drag him into court?"

Here's a rundown of the case and the ruling, which was issued on Friday. Colorado Ethics Watch and Colorado Common Cause filed a complaint against Gessler in April, asking the court to invalidate rule changes that they believe would have allowed some organizations to support races without revealing their finances or even their identities. In the lawsuit, the groups say these policy alterations make the campaign finance process in Colorado less transparent.

luis toro 2010 photo.jpg
Luis Toro
In his ruling, Denver District Court Judge J. Eric Elliff struck down several of Gessler's rules arguing that the secretary exceeded his administrative authority by writing rules that would excuse most 527s (defined as tax-exempt political organizations) from any disclosure requirements. The ruling also eliminated rules that would have reduced disclosure requirements of issue committees and state PACs as well as reduce penalties for failure to report large contributions.

"While the Secretary's pragmatism is to be respected, removing a critical element of 2(12)(a) [one of the rules in question] by rule goes beyond the Secretary's powers," the decision says.

Another part of the ruling argues that "the Secretary's rules improperly narrow the definition of 'political organization,'" meaning that, under the changes Gessler proposed, it would basically be easier for groups to avoid disclosures:

These narrowing rules effectively eliminate distinctions between "political organization" and "political committee." Political committees, subject to a constitutional contribution reporting limit of $200, could switch to a "political organization" and avoid this restriction under the challenged rules. Such a result is contrary to the clear terms of the statute and the intent of the legislature.

In other words, Gessler's rules give groups the opportunity to avoid reporting requirements even as they contradict legislative regulations -- which is not the secretary's job as part of the executive branch of government.

"If [Gessler] wants to change these things, he needs to go to the legislature and convince them to pass a bill or go to the people and convince them to amend the state constitution," Toro says.

Page down to read Gessler's response and see the full ruling.

Sponsor Content

My Voice Nation Help
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Now Trending

Denver Concert Tickets

From the Vault