Top

blog

Stories

 

James Holmes case: Leak fears inspire order denying access to evidence for victims' lawsuits

Thumbnail image for james holmes mug shot 2 cropped.jpg
James Holmes.
Update: Judge William Sylvester, the jurist overseeing the Aurora theater shooting case against accused murderer James Holmes, has denied a request for access to evidence from three victims suing Cinemark, owner of the Century 16, where twelve people died and 58 were injured during the July 20 attack. An implied reason why not: fear that key information might be leaked.

brandon axelrod meets the press.jpg
Brandon Axelrod, left, speaks with reporters in the days after the Aurora theater shooting.
As we've reported, at least three suits have been filed on behalf of victims accusing Cinemark in negligence -- the latest under the auspices of attorney Marc Bern, whose firm won a big settlement on behalf of 9/11 first responders. Sylvester's just-issued order addresses two other complaints -- one filed jointly by Denise Traynom and Brandon Axelrod, the other by Joshua Nowlan, each of whom sustained injuries in the attack. But they all make similar arguments, maintaining that Cinemark should have had alarms on auditorium exit doors that would have prevented suspect Holmes from blocking them open in order to arm himself, and that the theater should have had security personnel on hand due to past violent incidents there.

Note that although the Traynom-Axelrod and Nowlan suits originally cited "at least one shooting, involving gang members" at the theater, that reference has been amended -- something Cinemark cites in a motion to dismiss the complaints.

Earlier this month, Holmes's legal team objected to the release of information to the victims suing Cinemark. In a document seen in full below, they argued that those suing "have not asserted a legally cognizable interest in Mr. Holmes's criminal case. Rather, they are seeking access to documents and evidence, some of which is presently suppressed in the court file and some of which is not in the Court's possession, to aid them in pursuing their civil case against Cinemark USA, Inc. The law does not authorize them to intervene in Mr. Holmes's criminal case to engage in this pursuit."

The attorneys attempt to bolster this claim via citations from previous cases -- but they also offer another argument:

Finally, even if this Court were to entertain the victims' request to intervene for the purpose of obtaining documents and evidence for use in their civil case, Mr. Holmes objects. Because of the sensitive nature of the information involved and the intense public scrutiny this case has received, there is a high likelihood that the release of this information at this early stage in the proceedings would jeopardize his right to a fair trial by an impartial jury, as protected by the Colorado and federal constitutions.
In the end, Sylvester gave the defense lawyers the denial they requested. But his rationale was a bit different than theirs.

Continue to learn more about Judge William Sylvester's latest ruling and to see newly released documents.


My Voice Nation Help
10 comments
dcCU
dcCU

Fair comes once a month in the summer if one is lucky enough to live in a town that brings in the carnival. Life is not fair. However, The Judge's decision was fair in upholding the due process of law.

SheilahT
SheilahT

Do the defense lawyers want to talk about unfairness? 

 

Getting shot by a psychotic monster just for seeing a movie is unfair.  Losing life and limb due to another's rage, anger issue, psychotic episode or whatever the heck went on in this monster's head is unfair.  Having his public defender act like he's a victim while taking getting paid with public money is unfair.   

 

The sharing of information is part of the discovery process.  The lawyers ought to pony up and stop complaining.  The truth will eventually come out anyway. 

 

 

Stephen At Half Aspen
Stephen At Half Aspen

I wish that folks would remember that a fair trial isn't in place to protect the guilty, it's to protect the innocent.

Paul Vincent Saurini
Paul Vincent Saurini

Is this an obviously guilty man and does the judicial system function like an ass? yes and yes

Kris Anger
Kris Anger

Everyone will have access to the evidence and records after the trial. Let the courts do the work and proceed sentencing him.

Renee Lov
Renee Lov

Hes always zoned out in court...he wont notce

Legen Dairy
Legen Dairy

He shouldn't get a trial your guilty proceed straight to sentencing.

Now Trending

Denver Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

Loading...