Marijuana arrests in Colorado and beyond a "moral catastrophe," says study author

Thumbnail image for man hands in handcuffs.jpg
At 10 a.m. today, just prior to a moms against Amendment 64 event sponsored by opponents of the Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol act, supporters of the measure will be holding a press event of their own -- this one highlighting the release of a new report showing that marijuana possession arrests in Colorado fall disproportionately on the young and people of color. We interview a co-author of the study below.

The study, on view below in its entirety, puts its grabbiest stat in its title: "210,000 Marijuana Possession Arrests in Colorado." Here's a graphic showing the year-by-year breakdown, which cover the span between 1986 and 2010:

marijuana possession arrests graphic.jpg
And here are what study authors Harry Levine, Jon Gettman and Loren Siegel characterize as their "key findings:"
• Marijuana possession arrests in Colorado increased from 4,000 in 1986 to over 10,000 in 2010, totaling 210,000 arrests over the past 25 years.

• In the five years from 1986 to 1990, police in Colorado made 19,400 possession arrests. Twenty years later, from 2006 to 2010, police made 55,900 marijuana possession arrests, almost three times as many.

• From 2001 through 2010, Colorado police made 108,000 arrests for possessing marijuana, overwhelmingly of young people. More than two-thirds (69 percent) of those arrested were 25 or younger, 79 percent were 29 or younger, and 86 percent of those arrested were age 34 and younger.

• Whites, mainly young whites, made up 63 percent of those arrested in the last ten years. Blacks and Latinos, also mostly young, were 36 percent of the arrestees.

• Although young African Americans and Latinos use marijuana at lower rates than young whites, in the last ten years police in Colorado arrested Latinos at 1.5 times the rate of whites and arrested blacks at 3.1 times the rate of whites.

• In the last decade, blacks were 3.8 percent of Colorado's residents, but 10.5 percent of the marijuana arrests. Latinos were 19 percent of the state's residents, but a quarter (25 percent) of Colorado's marijuana possession arrests.

• Marijuana possession arrests create criminal records easily found on the Internet by employers, landlords, schools, credit agencies, licensing boards and banks, erecting barriers to education, employment and housing. Marijuana possession arrests do not reduce serious crimes, and they take police from other crime-fighting work.

• Colorado is often said to be a marijuana decriminalization state, but since the 1970s, Colorado law has made possession of small amounts of marijuana a crime, a Class 2 Petty Offense. Failure to appear in court as ordered by a summons is another crime, punishable by six months in jail and a $500 fine.

• In county courts, marijuana possession carries a $100 fine. In municipal courts, however, judges can impose fines of $300 or more, change $50 per month in probation fees, require regular drug testing, and send people to jail for several days if they have used marijuana.

Levine, a professor of sociology at the City University of New York's Queens College and co-director of the nonprofit Marijuana Arrest Research Project, speaks frankly about the report's release date.

"Of course this is timed to the amendment," he says from New York. "It helps us to get attention for what we regard as a national scandal. This is what we do: We try to call attention to what we think is a nationwide scandal about marijuana possession arrests and the collateral consequences."

Continue to read more of our interview with Harry Levine and see the complete study.


My Voice Nation Help
258 comments
IcePick
IcePick

Vote Yes on A64, Even donkey can't tell you why to vote against.

 

Yes on A64!

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

Behold the BIG LIE behind the bogus A64! -- the utterly false claim of preventing "10,000 arrests for marijuana possession every year"

 

A64 would NOT prevent a SINGLE ARREST for possession, since its pathetically puny limit is HALF that which is already decriminalized by Colorado Statute -- for EVERYBODY.

 

A64 = a FRAUD.

 

TheSpleen
TheSpleen

 @DonkeyHotay Again and again, you lie. Anyone who has actually read 64 knows you are full of shit. Fuck you, douchebag.

MikeParent
MikeParent

 @DonkeyHotay Here's a question for you; Is what you have now better than A64?  I'm anxiously awaiting your answer.

kevin_hunt
kevin_hunt topcommenter

A64 = one ounce six plants no doctor's visits.

 

No mandatory court appearance and $100 fine for < 1 oz.

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

 A64 = No Reduction in Arrests for Marijuana Crimes!

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter like.author.displayName 1 Like

*** Vote NO on Unjust A64 !! ***

 

Say NO to discrimination !!

 

Say NO to a continuation of Criminal Prohibition !!

 

Say NO to the Lying Liars who are promoting this crap !!

 

Say NO to huge New Taxes !!

 

Say NO to Big Government Regulation !!

 

Say NO to the Destruction of Medical Marijuana !!

 

Say NO to out-of-state carpetbaggers meddling in Colorado politics !!

 

This comment has been deleted

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

 @TheSpleen Yes ... the perfect reason to permanently Amend the Colorado Constitution!

 

Stupid Stoners are as Stupid Stoners do !!

nemopunk15
nemopunk15 topcommenter like.author.displayName 1 Like

Well have all known for a long time that Donkey has no idea what the words Legal and Decriminalized mean.

 

Today we learned that Donkey has no idea what the words FBI and Crime Report mean.

 

See, you learn something every day, unless your donkey.

 

Educate, Legalize, Regulate, Tax! 

Yes We Cannabis! +

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

 @nemopunk15 "See, you learn something every day, unless your [sic] donkey."

 

Priceless.

 

Stoners + Grammar = Fail.

 

 

nemopunk15
nemopunk15 topcommenter

 @DonkeyHotay Have you looked up the words "Legal" and "decriminalized" yet?

 

How many of those 10,000 Arrests in Colorado were for growing 1-6 plants?

 

Just admit you're a black market pot dealer worried about losing business because every customer you have that is over 21 would much rather shop in a store than your living room.

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

 @nemopunk15 

 

Don't forget: A64 = ZERO Reductions in Arrests !!

 

A festering turd is still a festering turd, even if you dip it in chocolate and call it "legalization".

 

Bon Appétit !

nemopunk15
nemopunk15 topcommenter

 @DonkeyHotay So that is a no, you still have not looked up those words yet. You love using them, you should really take a moment and look them up. Your confusion will melt like BHO.

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

 

 

 @nemopunk15 "How many of those 10,000 Arrests in Colorado were for growing 1-6 plants?"

 

The proponents of A64 have not provided a SINGLE arrest of anyone OVER 21 who was arrested for simply cultivating 3 (three) flowering plants ... not one.

 

The liars in the above study have claimed that the 10,000 arrests per year are for marijuana POSSESSION, not cultivation, not sales, not distribution.

 

A64's possession limit is LESS than what is currently decriminalized by statute in Colorado, and it further restricts with its arbitrary age limitation.

 

Reduction in Arrests for Possession under A64 = ZERO !!

 

Does it hurt ... to be ... so ignorant?

 

pitchman101
pitchman101 like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @nemopunk15

 Ya nemopunk. I tryed to look up the meaning of DONKYHOTAY and the closest I could come to was ASS HOTEL. oookay!

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter like.author.displayName 1 Like

"Colorado is often said to be a marijuana decriminalization state, but since the 1970s, Colorado law has made possession of small amounts of marijuana a crime,"

 

BULLSHIT !! --- more lies from the lying liars behind A64!

 

Colorado DE-criminalized marijuana possession in 1975, for EVERYBODY without arbitrary age restrictions -- possession of up to 2 (two) ounces is NOT A CRIME in Colorado.

 

These pathetic liars can't even get current statutory law correct.

 

A64 = a continuation of 10,000 arrests every year.

 

A64 = a big lie !!

 

Why do Brain Vicente, Mason Tvert and Betty Aldworth LIE so much ??

 

This comment has been deleted

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

 @TheSpleen So the Authors of A64 were LYING when they clearly stated it would NOT legalize marijuana in Colorado?

pitchman101
pitchman101

 @DonkeyHotay

 You are a waist of space on these forums. I've seen your name on many other sites and have seen you've been band. What is your agenda?. Clearly it has nothing to do with common sense!. You would prefer to allow funding the cartels over funding needs of the American people through taxes?.

 By not legalizing,You would prefer allowing these same illegal drug pushers to maintain contact with the children of our state/country?, allowing our children access to other drugs that truely are harmful to our children?.Continue to allow funding the cartel's activity's all across the world?. What a puts you and whomever you represent are!

 YES on 64. Its way past time the American people wake up to the harm this bullshit war on Marijuana has cost us all!. currently 17 states have realised there is an issue regarding the ignorant beleif that mariuana is an evil herb with no real benefits. Soon there WILL be states letting our government know that there policy's have destroyed to many life's by incarsuration for possesion and that the current policy's actualy fund illegal activity all across the world.

 To many good people inprisoned for nothing more than a joint or a bag of pot as well as a perminant record of a drug conviction. What a joke!.

 Marijauna will be legal in my lifetime. Thats a fact you can take to the bank. with, or without your help or aproval DONKEYHOTAY. You are a dieing bread in this fight to sustain an unmoral, unethical, war against the citizens of the U.S.A for the use of Canibus, by the U.S Government to maintain a status quo that wasnt justifiable in the 1930's and is without a dought unjust in the 21st century.

 The war on drugs is nothing more than a modern day witch hunt based on propaganda  and false acusations that ignorants in position of control continue to try making the sheep follow. Problem is, the sheep out number the ignorant's in the 21st century and your thought process is no longer relevent in todays society!.

 Time for you to pick a new war becouse this one is coming to an end very soon!.

 

 

 

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

 @pitchman101 "You are a waist [sic] of space on these forums. I've seen your name on many other sites and have seen you've been band [sic]."

 

Typical Illiterate Stoner -- 2 FAILS in the first 2 sentences.

 

BTW -- A64 does NOT legalize marijuana, so the rest of your delusional yammering is completely irrelevant.

 

 

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

 @pitchman101  @orson 

 

Colorado was one of the leaders in decriminalizing marijuana possession -- back in 1975 ! -- decriminalized for EVERYONE without arbitrary age restrictions.

 

A few other states also decriminalized marijuana in the 70's.

 

They were the "leaders" ... so in the last 35+ years, why haven't the remaining 40+ states followed ?

 

The Stoner Delusion that "other states" will follow, or that "the Feds will listen" or even more laughably that "the Feds will be FORCED" to do something is just a naive pipe dream.

 

Alcohol Prohibition was repealed 79 years ago ... and there are still 500 (five hundred) dry counties/cities that PROHIBIT Alcohol in the USA.

 

hth.

pitchman101
pitchman101 like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @orson

 Absolutly wrong. There needs to be a leader in legalizing Marijuana and Colorado / Washington  have taken the steps to confront the Feds on this issue. Granted, There are many existing laws that revolve around the existing marijuana regualations that will have to be adressed or changed after MJ is legalized. doesnt mean it shouldnt be done. Its a stepping stone toward the feds getting it right

 By the way, On this issue!, I dont support the federal governemnt. There thinking, ( As well as yours) is no longer in touch with the will of the mejority of the people.

. Our government work for us!. Not the other way around.

   Why when I look at the number of people online here does it show only two when I'm having to deal with discussing this issue with the two of you?. Shouldnt it say Three?.  

 

orson
orson like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

 @pitchman101   Unfortunately A64 is a continuation of injustice.  Branding marijuana like alcohol is unjust.  Continuing to jail marijuana users based on arbitrary limits is unjust...and so on and so on.  A64 IS unjust!  If you want the support of the federal government the best approach is to keep it medical, expand access and rights to medical marijuana, and wait for more states to adopt medical marijuana laws.  In the meantime, vote NO on A64.

 

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @pitchman101 They have this magic on the interwebs these days ... it's called Spell Checker ... look into it.

 

The War on Marijuana USERS is unjust -- but the users just can't seem to extract themselves from their idiotic puerile pot-clown antics long enough to form a coherent, cogent political strategy strong enough to effect any meaningful change -- hence the utter bullshit like A64 which solves NOTHING -- won't prevent a SINGLE ARREST if it passes, yet wasted nearly $3 MILLION in advertising/lobbying money ... that could have been better spent on something that would ACTUALLY REDUCE some of the 10,000 they claim are arrested every year in Colorado for marijuana crimes.

 

 

 

 

pitchman101
pitchman101

 @DonkeyHotay

 My spelling has never been a strong point DONK. The mesage is still relevent! Thanks for the trip though. Still doesnt change the FACT that the war on Marijuana is unjust.regardless of the number of FAILS you give me. In the end, You and your agenda will fail. Thanks for playing the game though.

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

 @pitchman101 "your [sic]  funny DONK. Just so happens, I'm completly [sic] not on pot but you truely [sic] show that you have no argument other than to try to insult me. That [sic] OK!. Good luck with your agenda! Your [sic] going to need it!"

 

5 (five) FAILS !!

 

We have a winner! -- for an all expense paid trip back to elementary school English grammar class ... courtesy of Doctor Reefer.

 

 

orson
orson

 @pitchman101  

 

step one - decrim

step two - A20

one small step back for man one giant leap back for mankind - A64

pitchman101
pitchman101

 @DonkeyHotay

your  funny DONK. Just so happens, I'm completly not on pot but you truely show that you have no argument other than to try to insult me. That OK!. Good luck with your agenda! Your going to need it!

pitchman101
pitchman101

 @DonkeyHotay

 17 states have aproved MMJ with more to come. Its a process DONK. takes time. just becouse the feds came down on Montana does not mean its not going to be legal some day. It just shows the ignorance of the federal government in thinking this war on Marijuana is something they still control. The will of the people budy!

 Two steps forward, one step back. There will be a day that the two steps forward will prevail.That being legal use of Marijuana.

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

 @pitchman101  "It legalizes it on my states [sic] level to the point that the federal government will have no choice but to start taking notice that there [sic] crap policy's [sic] will not maintain the status quo!"

 

Congratulations!! -- 3 FAILS in 1 Sentence,

 

Have another bong hit!

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @pitchman101 " It legalizes it on my states level"

 

No, it does not. Even the Authors of A64 admit it does NOT legalize marijuana. You haven't been paying attention, have you?

 

 @pitchman101  "to the point that the federal government will have no choice"

 

LOL! ... right, like they had no choice in Montana when they busted the ENTIRE MMJ industry in one day!

 

 

 

pitchman101
pitchman101

 @DonkeyHotay

 It legalizes it on my states level to the point that the federal government will have no choice but to start taking notice that there crap policy's will not maintain the status quo!

 

kevin_hunt
kevin_hunt topcommenter

Current Decriminalization = mandatory court appearance AND $100 fine.

orson
orson like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @kevin_hunt 

 

Smoke marijuana in public pre-A64 = mandatory court appearance AND $100 fine

 

Smoke marijuana in public post-A64 = mandatory court appearance AND $100 fine ..... wow that's so legal

kevin_hunt
kevin_hunt topcommenter

 @orson "wow that's so legal"

 

Donkey says Think of it as a Tax on Stupidity.

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @orson  @kevin_hunt 

 

Like I told Kevin and NosePick -- think of it as a Tax on Stupidity 

 

Imagine all the schools they can build with it !!

 

 

kevin_hunt
kevin_hunt topcommenter

 @DonkeyHotay  @orson 

It's a "Tax on Stupidity"?

 

You are the one that constantly writes: "Only fools beg the government to tax or restrict something they care about", yet you agree with the current $100 fine (tax) on possession or public use?  

 

Are you begging the government to continue to tax something you care about?

 

The Donkey knows no consistency..

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

 @kevin_hunt Only for Puerile Pot Clowns dumb enough to get caught ... like you.

 

Think of it as a Tax on Stupidity.

 

RevRayGreen
RevRayGreen like.author.displayName 1 Like

here is my reply to DonkeyHokeyDuh - RevGreen take on Anti-64(CO)CannabisCONsumers Sunday A-64 Sermon to the agents of Lucifer  http://youtu.be/zXFpR9JaTvo

 

Iowa NICER 2012 'Rev Ray Green Question 4 the choir of cannabis consumers'

http://youtu.be/1AzUyxSI5b4

orson
orson like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

 @RevRayGreen  Maybe with your religious background you can appeal to the religious conservatives out there.  By all means, preach on dude.  Who needs Pat Robertson when you got a guy like the Rev Ray Green on your side.

 

Anti-64(CO)CannabisCONsumers Sunday A-64 Sermon to the agents of Lucifer  http://youtu.be/zXFpR9JaTvo

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @RevRayGreen  = another know-nothing out-of-state meddler in Colorado politics.

 

You *deserve* to live in Iowa.

.

orson
orson like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @DonkeyHotay  Sounds like somebody needs another round of sacrament......rofl

mattleising
mattleising like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @RevRayGreen What part of Iowa are you from man? Don't worry this Coloradan right here has your back!

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter like.author.displayName 1 Like

The Abject Lies Proffered by the Prevaricating Pimps Promoting A64 = Moral Catastrophe of Epic Proportions.

From the Vault

 

©2013 Denver Westword, LLC, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Denver / Boulder

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city