Scott Gessler: Top Democratic officials silent about potential spending investigation

Hickenlooper and Hancock, thumb.jpg
Big photos below.
While Secretary of State Scott Gessler continues to face backlash for his efforts to remove potentially illegal voters from the rolls, his communications team last week was also forced to respond to more serious allegations -- that the Republican official misused public dollars for his private, political travels. But despite such accusations, the state's top Democrats have nothing to say about them.

As we noted last week, Colorado Ethics Watch, a left-leaning good-government group and frequent critic of Gessler, called for an investigation into the Secretary of State for potentially using public dollars to fund a trip to a Republican National Lawyers Association election law training in Sarasota, Florida and then onward to Tampa for the Republican National Convention.

Scott Gessler, press conference October.JPG
Sam Levin
Scott Gessler addressing reporters earlier this month.
Gessler, records show, requested $1,452.52 in reimbursements. His office maintains that he did not spend public dollars for the RNC and that the other event constituted official Secretary of State business.

Ethics Watch says it is unclear at this point how bad this potential corruption could be, which is why the group wants the district attorney and the Denver Police Department to launch an investigation. Additionally, Ethics Watch has also filed a complaint with the Colorado Independent Ethics Commission, asking it to investigate Gessler and fine him for his actions.

Last week, the Denver Post did an in-depth look at spending by other statewide officials, finding that Gessler is the only one to tap these funds for partisan uses -- making the allegations more damning, some of his opponents say.

In statements to us, Gessler's office came down hard on Ethics Watch, accusing the group of playing partisan politics, though Ethics Watch says it also investigated Democratic officials in this case.

One of those scrutinized by the watchdog group is Governor John Hickenlooper, a Democrat and surrogate for Barack Obama, who traveled to the Democratic National Convention. Ethics Watch did not find any misuse of funds from the governor's office.

Hickenlooper recently told us he worries that Gessler's effort to remove immigrant voters who may be illegally registered could intimidate some legal voters from going to the polls. (This week, the Associated Press reported on the latest round of checks from Gessler's office, which is now claiming that 300 more suspected non-citizens are on the voter rolls. And Gessler has gotten national media attention for his efforts).

Hickenlooper, however, doesn't have anything to say on the other Gessler controversy, regarding alleged corruption.

At an Obama campaign press conference on Monday to promote the launch of early voting in Colorado, we asked the four Democratic officials championing the president if they had any response to the calls for an investigation into Gessler.

Early voting, handing in ballots.JPG
Sam Levin
Hickenlooper, Bennet, DeGette and Hancock handing in their ballots on Monday in Denver.
"We're not gonna talk about that today. We're talking about early voting," responded Representative Diana DeGette, who has been campaigning for Obama all election season. And with that, the news conference ended, in time for DeGette, alongside Hickenlooper, Denver Mayor Michael Hancock and Senator Michael Bennet to head inside the Denver Elections Division and cast their ballots in front of a bunch of cameras.

Continue for additional commentary from Hickenlooper as well as response from Gessler's office.


My Voice Nation Help
3 comments
RobertChase
RobertChase topcommenter

Colorado's Democratic officials are silent on a host of issues on which they should speak out, and take the wrong position on most of the rest.

 

Is Colorado dumb enough to let Hack use 325 top managerial positions in the State Civil Service for political patronage based on his miserable performance so far?  According to CPR, Amendment S' chief impediment is that people do not understand it -- I reject that claim -- all CPR offered on the subject of Amendment S was that coded endorsement of it:  I think that most voters, even Hack's partisans, do not agree with opening up of the whole State bureaucracy to political interference.  I would say the opposite of CPR:  ignorance of Amendment S' provisions (and Hack's endorsement) is all that it has going for it.

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

Gessler should be in prison!

RobertChase
RobertChase topcommenter

 @DonkeyHotay Funny; elsewhere you say that in a democracy, people get the government they deserve -- you fight to maintain Prohibition by telling us that we deserve the predatory fascists fools in the electorate keep electing to office; Gessler fails to itemize ~$1,400 in discretionary expenditures, and you propose to dispatch the People's choice straight into prison!  Your monumental hypocrisy is noted.

Now Trending

Denver Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

Loading...