Butch Jones-to-CU report botched by Denver Post based on single source

butch jones small.jpg
Butch Jones.
Update: Yesterday, we reported that Cincinnati coach Butch Jones had turned down the CU Buffs football coach job, despite the Denver Post reporting that he'd accepted it the day before; see our previous coverage below. Now, we know more about what led the Post to ballyhoo this erroneous information -- trust in a single source that turned out to be flat wrong.

Jones confirmed his rejection of CU's $13.5 million offer yesterday morning, with initial reports stating that he had chosen to remain in Cincinnati. But that assertion didn't hold for long. He subsequently resigned in order to take the head coaching job with the Tennessee Volunteers.

Before the Vols move, Post news director Kevin Dale tweeted the following:

He followed with this addendum:

Not long thereafter, media watcher Jim Romenesko featured Dale's tweets in an item headlined "It's Those Single-Source Stories That Always Get You in Trouble."

Did the Post take the plunge based on the say-so of only one individual? I posed that question, among others, to Dale in an e-mail sent yesterday. In his reply, he didn't answer directly. He wrote:

Clearly we were confident in our sourcing or we wouldn't have pushed the button. As to what happened next, we are fully reporting the story and will publish what we find. If that reporting includes The Post in any way, we'll be transparent about that.
The presumptive example of the latter appears in the story "Colorado football moves to Plan B after Butch Jones backs out," whose headline implies that Jones had indeed accepted the job -- although CU athletic director Mike Bohn doesn't say that in comments to the paper. "It was so extremely close," Bohn is quoted as saying. "We thought we were really in good position in getting the deal done until early (Wednesday) night. Then there was a whole new development" -- Jones's head being turned by an offer from Tennessee, presumably.

The article also states: "Late Wednesday afternoon, a source with knowledge of the situation had told The Denver Post that Jones would come to Colorado and only the final details needed to be worked out. Soon after, Jones denied he had agreed to come to Colorado."

In our previous coverage, on view below, we defended the Post, despite the paper getting a big story wrong in an embarrassing way. The blame, we suggested, should be placed on the source, who for whatever reason spoke prematurely, with the result being public denials that gave Tennessee the chance to swoop in.

Of course, there's also the possibility that Jones cynically used CU to pump up offers at schools he preferred -- and it's a realistic one. But the bottom line is, the Post's trust in its source was misplaced, and it's now left looking oafish on a slew of different levels.

Romenesko was right: It is those single source stories that get you in trouble....

Continue for our previous coverage of the Butch Jones-CU debacle.

Sponsor Content

My Voice Nation Help
DonkeyHotay topcommenter

Like Westword's botched coverage of the worthless turd that is A64 being based upon the single, unverified source of the Lying Liars -- Vicente & Tvert -- who were promoting that piece of crap.

Pot -- Kettle -- pile of festering feces.


I'm CONSTANTLY reminded of what a complete MORON Woody Paige is & we ALL share in wondering HOW he got his national gig w/ ESPN in the 1st place. I'm not a big fan of P.T.I. w/ or w/o Woody.  His mere presence makes it IMPOSSIBLE for me to watch. 

As far as the Post is concerned, I boycotted the publication quite a ways back, w/ Woody being one of the MANY reasons. Actually, there's WAY too many to list. To it's defense, I've been told it makes a fantastic litter-box liner.


The fact it was Woody Plaige was the dead giveaway that he wasn't going to confirm it with another source. And now the spin is "We believed the story when we posted it" garbage. Just admit it: You relied on ONE source and ONE source only. Journalism Fail 101.


Mike - you are giving the Denver Post way too much credit.  A source is using the media for their purposes.  That is why typically a reporter will rely or insist on getting the same confirmation from at least 2 other 'sources'.  Call this for what it is:  Usery.  The Denver Post was used.  The source assumed correctly that the Post would not double check before going to print.  And for what?  Another egg-on-the-face moment for the Denver Post and the quick as lightening journalism that is regularly wrong in situations like this. 

Now Trending

Denver Concert Tickets

Around The Web

From the Vault