Scott Gessler responds to ethics complaint with new details on death threats, his spending

The response to the IEC also includes internal e-mails within the Secretary of State's office, in which several high-ranking staff members discuss the seriousness of the threats and communicate with the Colorado Bureau of Investigation about them. This, according to Gessler's filings, makes it clear that he needed to come home early -- a move for which his office paid $422.

The filing says:

Two violent threats in rapid succession - a serious, specific, local telephone threat, possibly linked to an earlier email threat of violence against the Secretary's family - caused great alarm. Heightening the alarm was the sudden, unusual nature of these threats. Indeed, prior to the two threats, the Secretary had never received a single death threat during 17 months in office.

An expenditure to respond to threats, his attorneys argue, is appropriate.

Scott Gessler talks to reporters.jpeg
Sam Levin
Scott Gessler
While these threats have gotten a lot of attention and will likely continue to as the investigations continue, they are only one piece of the puzzle. Ethics Watch has repeatedly said that the early flight home doesn't change Gessler's other spending choices, which it charges could amount to corruption and criminality.

Gessler's legal team says that his "actions were legal, proper, and fully within any applicable ethical standards." In its complaint, Ethics Watch says state law mandates that funds be used "for official state business purposes only."

Gessler receives $5,000 in discretionary funds each year and, the filing says, "for
expenditure in pursuance of official business as each elected official sees fit."

Some have interpreted official business to include parties, clothing, receptions and more, his attorneys argue, noting that the Republican National Lawyers' Association trip involved election law, which is pertinent to his the duties of his office. Gessler also participated on a panel called "The Department of Justice, the Role of the States, and Voter ID," the filing notes.

In response to separate accusations that Gessler may have embezzled or misreported $117.99 that remained in his discretionary fund at the end of of the 2012 fiscal year, his attorneys argue that there are many expenses above that amount for which he has not sought reimbursements, such as his cell phone bill. The filing provides a lengthy list of expenses that he never reimbursed.

And, echoing Gessler's frequent comments on the matter, the filing presents Ethics Watch as an attack group with a vendetta against Gessler:

Accordingly, this Commission should dismiss the Complaint because [Ethics Watch]...seeks to manipulate the Commission's proceedings as part of a partisan, political campaign against the Secretary.

Luis Toro, director of Ethics Watch, says he hasn't received the entire response and hasn't had a chance to review it thoroughly yet. But he tells us that while he is very sensitive to the threats that Gessler has faced, but that doesn't excuse improper spending.

"Of course we sympathize with all public officials who receive those types of threats and it's all too common and completely unacceptable," he says, but adds, "That's $400 of the picture.... That's what it is. It certainly doesn't retroactively justify him going out to partisan political events in the first place."

On arguments that the Republican lawyers event was official business, Toro says that it was a personal trip -- which is what makes it inappropriate. "If you hold office parties, that's for the office. I think that would be perfectly reasonable," he adds.

But Toro does not think the discretionary fund should be used for clothing.

And he adds that "the fact that other people have abused the funds in the past" does not make it okay.

As for accusations that this is just a partisan political attack, Toro responses: "To make it about the complaining party is really just an attempt to silence whistleblowers."

Continue for the full documents from Gessler's legal team.


Sponsor Content

My Voice Nation Help
3 comments
Archaic
Archaic

According to the exhibits, the guy who made the phone threat was arrested on August 29.  And the arguably-threatening-to-his-family e-mail is dated August 23.

According to the Affidavit, Gessler flew home on August 31.  Hardly "immediate", and curiously the day after the Republican Convention adjourned.  Looks like hearing Mitt's speech in-person was so much more vital to the protection of his family. 

This is why it's better to read the documents instead of listen to a lawyer spin the tale.

CoreyDonahue
CoreyDonahue

A disturbing phone call made to Secretary of State Scott Gessler.  

Disturbing yes!! But how many people does that affect. 

WHERE IS THE DISTURBING PHONE CALL MADE THAT TOOK PLACE BETWEEN NIXONLOOPER AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT REGARDING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A64?

CoreyDonahue
CoreyDonahue

@Archaic Dude they don´t read the documents.  Westword is the ALT form of propaganda for the kids.  Have to indocternate them as well or this whole scam does not work.  Pluss it makes the reporters job a lot easier just to print the propagand they are handed, instead of practicing actual journilism.

WHERE IS THE DISTURBING PHONE CALL MADE THAT TOOK PLACE BETWEEN NIXONLOOPER AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT REGARDING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A64?

Now Trending

Denver Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

Loading...