Aurora theater shooting judge allows subpoena of Fox News reporter about info "leak"

My Voice Nation Help
12 comments
Juan_Leg
Juan_Leg topcommenter

We didn't receive ANYTHING resembling the truth when the '911 Commission Report' was released .

What makes one think this will be any different ? Accountability is strictly for the poor !

Juan_Leg
Juan_Leg topcommenter

He made her show her boobs first ......

vox-populi
vox-populi

good luck with that. This is EXACTLY what reporters don't have to divulge their sources.

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter like.author.displayName 1 Like

@vox-populi ... you really are a legal ignoramus, aren't you?

Do tell, in your deluded mind, what law says reporters don't have to divulge their sources when subpoenaed by the court?

[ cue crickets chirping ]

vox-populi
vox-populi

@DonkeyHotay @vox-populi it won't be divulged. he won't know. chirp.

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

@BackOffImStarving @DonkeyHotay @vox-populi

The issue of a reporter's privilege came to the forefront of media attention in the case In re Miller, involving reporters Judith "Dick Cheney's Mouthpiece" Miller and Matthew Cooper.

 Miller and Cooper were both served with grand jury subpoenas for testimony and information, including notes and documents pertaining to conversations with specific and all other official sources relating the Plame affair. Both refused to submit to the subpoenas, claiming a reporter’s privilege. The federal district court held both Miller and Cooper in civil contempt of court, and the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the orders of contempt.


Miller and Cooper, in their appeal to the appellate court pleaded several defenses including a First Amendment reporter’s privilege and a common law reporter’s privilege. The appellate court rejected both the First Amendment and common law claims for privilege. The court held Miller and Cooper in civil contempt of court and sentenced both to eighteen months of jail time. The sentence was stayed pending an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.


However, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the case. Judith Miller began serving the remaining four months of the original eighteen-month sentence on July 6, 2005. Matthew Cooper’s confidential source released him from their confidentiality agreement, so he chose to comply with the subpoena and has agreed to testify before the grand jury

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter like.author.displayName 1 Like

@vox-populi ... your pathetically false assertion that reporters can't be required to divulge their sources is still an Epic Fail.


DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter like.author.displayName 1 Like

@vox-populi ... pathetic retreat from your laughably false assertion that reporters do not have to divulge their sources when subpoenaed by a court of law.

You = Vox Ignorami 

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter like.author.displayName 1 Like

@vox-populi ... then the reporter can rot in jail on contempt charges until they do divulge the source.

From the Vault

 

©2013 Denver Westword, LLC, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Denver / Boulder

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city