Gun policy: On day one, Diana DeGette introduces high-capacity magazine ban

There are arguments now that given the incredibly horrific nature of an elementary school shooting where so many young children died, these kinds of measures may, for the first time, get backing from Republicans.

Vigil, Aurora theater shooting.jpeg
Sam Levin
A vigil for the Aurora theater shooting on July 20.

DeGette, in her calls for stricter gun policies, has pointed out how close to home it is for her given that her district includes Columbine High School and is adjacent to Aurora.

"Since she was in the Colorado legislature...[she has been] very passionate about changing our gun laws to save lives," says Cohen.

Here's DeGette's official statement on the bill:

Since I came to Congress, I have been working to protect our children and our families from senseless gun violence. Recent tragedies have only heightened the need, and that is why Rep. McCarthy and I are reintroducing our bill to ban high-capacity assault magazines. While there is no single answer to stopping these massacres, this bill is a step that will go a long way toward making our country safe.

And here's the full news release:

WASHINGTON, DC -- Reps. Diana DeGette (D-CO1) and Carolyn McCarthy (NY-4) today introduced legislation today to ban the high-capacity assault magazines that have facilitated high numbers of casualties in almost every recent mass shooting in American history.

"These assault magazines help put the 'mass' in 'mass shooting' and anything we can do to stop their proliferation will save lives in America," Rep. McCarthy said. "These devices are used to kill as many people as possible in the shortest amount of time possible and we owe it to innocent Americans everywhere to keep them out of the hands of dangerous people. We don't even allow hunters to use them - something's deeply wrong if we're protecting game more than we're protecting innocent human beings."

"Since I came to Congress, I have been working to protect our children and our families from senseless gun violence," Rep. DeGette said. "Recent tragedies have only heightened the need, and that is why Rep. McCarthy and I are reintroducing our bill to ban high-capacity assault magazines. While there is no single answer to stopping these massacres, this bill is a step that will go a long way toward making our country safe."

The High Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Act, as the bill is formally known, bans the sale or transfer of ammunition magazines holding more than 10 rounds. Such a standard was federal law between 1994 and 2004, when the assault weapons ban was in effect, and it is state law in many parts of the United States. Magazines are available today in capacities of up to 100 and even more.

Law enforcement officials and analysts have cited the direct role that magazine capacity plays in ensuring the high numbers of casualties in mass shootings. Often, as in the cases of Tucson, Arizona and the Long Island Railroad, the carnage ends when the shooters run out of bullets and stop to reload, at which point they are stopped by bystanders.

Unfortunately, the devices are still easily available to the public and have been used in every mass shooting in recent history, such as: Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut; a shopping mall in Oregon; a temple in Wisconsin; a movie theater in Colorado; a Congressional event in Arizona; at schools like Columbine High School and Virginia Tech University; at a law office in California; and on a commuter rail car in New York. They were even acquired from the United States by mail order and used in the Norway shooting of 2011, where 69 people were shot to death.

In many cases, mass shooters intending to act don't have access to a black market, but acquire whatever they can easily and legally, making a ban on high-capacity magazines a major obstacle for future mass murderers to carry out their plans.

The legislation had 138 House co-sponsors in the 112th Congress, under the number H.R. 308. One hundred and eleven House members signed on after its introduction after the shooting in Tucson, Arizona; two more signed on after the shooting in Aurora, Colorado; then 25 more signed on after last month's shooting in Newtown, Connecticut.

Rep. McCarthy, a lifelong nurse, strode into a life of activism to reduce gun violence after her husband was murdered and son critically wounded in the 1993 mass shooting on the Long Island Railroad in New York. Her activism led her to Washington first to lobby members of Congress as an advocate for victims, and then as a member herself after running against her own congressman who voted against the assault weapons ban.

Rep. DeGette has been an outspoken supporter of measures to reduce gun violence and played a critical role in rounding up support for new cosponsors for the ban on high-capacity magazines after the most recent tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. Her district includes Columbine High School and is adjacent to that which includes Aurora, Colorado. She is now, with Rep. McCarthy, the original co-sponsor of the legislation, which will receive a bill number shortly.

The bill to ban high-capacity magazines was carried in the Senate in the 112th Congress by Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey. Sen. Lautenberg has helped lead the fight for safer gun policy for much of his decades-long career, writing the law to keep guns out of the hands of domestic violence offenders and co-sponsoring the original Brady Law to establish background checks for handgun purchases, among other efforts.

More from our Politics archive: "Death penalty: Representative Claire Levy says she is confident a repeal could pass"

Follow Sam Levin on Twitter at @SamTLevin. E-mail the author at Sam.Levin@Westword.com.

My Voice Nation Help
20 comments
Mark D Eilenberger
Mark D Eilenberger

Lets just repeal the 2nd amendment. It's obsolete and unnecessary. Take everyone's guns and dump them in the ocean. Should make an interesting artificial reef.

Sean Valdez
Sean Valdez

Batman grossed 144 million the night after the shooting that is proof of this, that shooting was like an advertisement for the the movie no one even said a word about this, this movie should have been boycott for two weeks or so instead it made 144 million, no one looks at the aurora shooting and says the way he went in their was similar to the way mass shootings occur in an action movie like batman..all these other crazy shooting and murders that have occurred this last year are all linked to the violent psyop that is being shoved down our throats on a regular basis,not contact sports those are sports, not mma, boxing, karate...decapitated bodies on channel 4 at 7:00 or 8, cop show with mass shootings at 8 or 9, burnt bodies, whatever vampire movie that involves a bunch of vampires who are human tearing each other to pieces at 7,action movies are ok, horror movies are alright but on TV ,if it wasen't on TV all the time, we have glorified violence, and murder in a way that is dangerous, we worry about the wrong things and we go after the wrong people we go after each other we restrict our own rights because of the action of a few, look at it like this, there are people who make billions off making your kids crazy from watching an over abundance of this crap or playing an over abundance of the violent crap they put out on xbox... first they make your kid crazy which causes you to put them on meds until they are adults, which causes one of them to go crazy and shoot up a school, or a mall,etc, which causes the outcry for stronger gun control, while 4 other violent games are put out and two new tv shows involving serial killers who like to eat suburban families and werewolves fighting ferries, while the government writes up a new plan to ban firearms from the common citizens which causes them to go on a firearm buying frenzy which causes this group of rich crazy mad men sitting at a round table to laugh hysterically because they own all of these industries,even the non profit that fight for more gun control while we yell at each other and beg for more laws to be put on us so yeah we need to have a real talk about this not point fingers at each other.PEACE

Sean Valdez
Sean Valdez

Im saying in most situations where someone is properly trained they will be accurate, the problem is violence, we live in a violent society, there is nothing wrong with action movies but tv shows should be put on hold, they have made everything realistic to a point where once again a kid knows what an ak47 is before they know what love is.

Chris Estus
Chris Estus

Last month there were 2.8 million background checks. 1% of the U.S poplutaion attemped to buy a gun in one month. Do you really think the American public supports these bans?

Stephan Reuchlein
Stephan Reuchlein

Sean, do your research, not lies, facts. In high stress situations such as self defense, accuracy goes down the crapper. And we don't go to gun free zones....

Charles Gleason
Charles Gleason

Cops should only be allowed to carry around billy clubs!

Sean Valdez
Sean Valdez

lastly if you ban my weapons then we ban everyones that means all cops have to carry around billy clubs... yes bill clubs that is all you get. If we ban weapons from one person then everyone loses them. PEACE

Sean Valdez
Sean Valdez

the talk of a ban has done nothing but make people go out and buy more firearms, that right there should tell you what people think of a ban, cut down on the violent tv shows. if you kid has no friends, doesnt play sports and only plays video games that involve going on shooting sprees, killling zombies... or tv shows that involve decapitated bodies, or whatever BS cop show that involves the cops capping a bystander,its like this kids know what an AK is before they know that love is that is what is messing everyone up

Sean Valdez
Sean Valdez

It doesn't matter go to ten round magazines or 20 round magazines,people will just learn to reload faster @STEPHEN your statistics are more BS lies from your side of the argument hey there was another shooting in NYC a city with ban of all firearms...HEY i got an idea why did batman make 144 million the night after the shooting it has nothing to do with who owns what but it has everything to do with our fucked up culture, how many of you gun control activist went and saw that movie right after that shooting happened...so when it is said and done who are the ones who are violent..

Charles Gleason
Charles Gleason

If we are going to start banning wepons, then let´s start withe the government of the United States, first no guns higher then a bb gun for police.

Valerie Cisneros
Valerie Cisneros

My mistake: banning magazines that hold more than 10 rounds... either way, THAT IS MY RIGHT. No, I don't see any need to have an automatic assault weapon that holds that many rounds, but of I were to feel it was necessary to defend my family against an enemy, foreign or otherwise, it is my right as citizen to have one and that right should not be taken due to a handful of criminal lunatics. Especially when acquiring the banned weapons/magazines/ammunition had never been a problem for criminals.

Stephan Reuchlein
Stephan Reuchlein

People should actually read the Bill of Rights, Constitution, and the Federalist Papers before they post. They should also research shooting accuracy in high stress situations. Almost half of shots miss their target even when fired by highly trained marksmen. In addition, criminals don't give a damn, do when you are protecting yourself with 10 rounds while they have thirty, who wins? Common sense people. Banning magazines will do NOTHING.

Mike Milos
Mike Milos

People should actually read before they post. I guess everyone who needs a "High Capacity Magazine" must be a piss poor shot. Don't it only take 1 or 2 bullets to kill a deer or elk? Did the animals find Kevlar, or something, that we need a hundred rounds to hunt them? I think my 30/06 only holds 6 shells, yet I still have gotten 9 Bull Elk and countless deer over the years. I guess I am missing something.

Valerie Cisneros
Valerie Cisneros

I (a conservative, Christian that owns zero guns) think that it is a ridiculous thought that my rights may be infringed upon because of some psychotic criminals actions. Having personally lost someone I loved in the theater shooting, I fully believe that a law banning guns did not even cross that monsters mind before he went on a killing spree. Passing more gun laws is not going to deter criminals (who very obviously do not regard laws very highly) It will make these weapons unavailable to us law abiding citizens only! Criminals have always found a way to acquire illegal weapons, that will not change.

Matt Leising
Matt Leising

What an absolute waste of the taxpayers money. The only thing that this is going to change is congress because DeGette has got to go

Tyler Mockli
Tyler Mockli

I love how everybody out there acts like we are the only country that makes guns. We outlawed drugs and mexican drug cartels took over, so what in the hell makes people think that if we make assult rifels illegal that russian and chines mafia wont be shipping Ak-47s to this country like Dope.... But this time ONLY the criminals will have them...

DonkeyHotay
DonkeyHotay topcommenter like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

Should Mental Defectives be allow to Possess Firearms?

Step 1 = integrate ALL Mental Health Records with CBI/ATF Background Checks.


From the Vault

 

©2013 Denver Westword, LLC, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Denver / Boulder

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city