Marijuana: High Times will likely sue if treat-pot-mags-like-porn provision goes forward

high.times.cover.tenacious.d.205x205.jpg
Last week, in a post about some of the more unusual aspects of the main bill to regulate Amendment 64, which allows adults 21 and over in Colorado to use and possess small amounts of cannabis, we highlighted a passage that would require marijuana magazines to be kept behind the counter of general retail outlets, much like porn publications. This morning, we reached out to High Times, arguably the planet's most prominent marijuana magazine -- and we're told that if this section becomes law, the state should expect a lawsuit.

As we've reported, the version of HB 13-1317 passed by the House (read it below) calls for "a requirement that magazines whose primary focus is marijuana or marijuana businesses are only sold in retail marijuana stores or behind the counter in establishments where persons under twenty-one years of age are present."

In other words, a convenience store wanting to stock publications such as High Times or THC Magazine won't be able to do so in standard racks easily accessible to customers. Rather, issues will be next to porn mags, with their covers presumably shielded to protect children -- and customers will have to ask clerks to grab copies for them.

Thumbnail image for warren edson photo.JPG
Warren Edson.
This edict dumbfounded marijuana attorney Warren Edson.

Amendment 64 proponents "said to regulate marijuana like alcohol," he told us, "but apparently, our legislature wants to regulate it like porn.

"How many beer brewing and distilling magazines are in the racks at the Tattered Cover -- yet they're going to make these magazines go behind the counter? Really?" In his view, this move "could be devastating for both the industry as a whole and consumers in terms of cutting back on information and ways to see new products -- because a lot of people aren't going to want the icky feeling of having to go into a 7-Eleven and ask, 'Can I see the magazine behind the brown paper bag?'"

dan skye.JPG
Dan Skye.
To get High Times' take, we reached out to Dan Skye, the magazine's editorial director. Responding via e-mail, Skye shares the reaction from publication attorney David Holland: "He called the magazine restriction 'patently unconstitutional' and said there's no legal precedent for treating pictures of a drug as obscene.

"Holland said the magazine would likely sue if the provision becomes law," Skye adds.

One more Holland quote offered by Skye: "It is a content-based restriction that violates freedom of speech."

Defending the language in a recent Associated Press piece was Representative Bob Gardner, a Republican from El Paso County, who didn't shy away from comparing pot mags and sexually explicit publications. "It's analogous to the pornography example," he said.

Nonetheless, Gardner conceded that he wouldn't be surprised if this section failed to make the final cut of 1317.

As for Edson, he's less certain the provision is toast. With so much focus being put on the question of driving under the influence of drugs (more on that shortly), he believes some items that might otherwise wind up being excised could slide through -- with the magazine provision being one possibility.

Here's the House-approved version of 13-1317.

House Bill 13-1317: Revised April 29, 2013

More from our Politics archive: "Marijuana retailers may not have to grow their own -- and that's great, attorney says."

My Voice Nation Help
15 comments
Peace Will Win
Peace Will Win

ohhh but sell all the gun mags you can in plain view...what a warped country

Michael Sink
Michael Sink

Dude, not all porn mags are kept behind the counter. Not in actual bookstores anyway. Maybe in greasy ass gas stations or something.

Monkey
Monkey

Funny stuff. High Times is fine when weed is illegal. It's fine when it's ok for medical reasons. It's ok for them to hold the cannabis cup in Denver. But now, it should have a brown bag over it? The more "legal" weed gets, the more stupid the legislators get. i guess smoking weed doesn't make you stupid, legislating weed does.

RevBF
RevBF

That's a pretty bizarre requirement. Would this apply to Westword? There's no doubt that the medicinal marijuana industry basically saved your physical publication and a substantial amount of your copy is based around pot. Would you have to pull your magazines from the racks at the front of the store and put them behind? 

Our six year old was reading a Westword she found in the back of the car some weeks ago and asked us what "marijuana" was (yes, she reads at about a 50 yr olds level), and since we're not nazis we told her and explained heavily on the subject of what's acceptable for adults and not acceptable for children. Regardless, it still shows that kids can get just about the same kind of influence from your magazine as with any High Times. The difference is, we won't and wouldn't have High Times in our backseat, but may have the occasional Westword. 

stuka1
stuka1


What a lovely smoke screen to divert attention away from prohibitionist efforts to pass laws taking away your children and charging you with CHILD ABUSE for exercising your A64 rights.

JimTom
JimTom topcommenter

They sell ones about sewing also, whats your point that guns are like porn?

stuka1
stuka1

@RevBF 

"Regardless, it still shows that kids can get just about the same kind of influence from your magazine as with any High Times. "

Have you even read High Times?

JimTom
JimTom topcommenter

@sucka1 They take peoples kids away every day for being loser drunks. And they should.

RevBF
RevBF

 I have, but what would that matter? The goal of either is to showcase a sub-culture directly related to the use of pot and profit from its advertisers. There may be a small amount of desire to push forward a cultural change with relevant content, but the overall purpose remains the same. So, why then, would me saying the influence of both are consistent with one another be of any issue? Weed magazines are weed magazines so I'm asking if there's any difference in the way they'd handle the provision. 

stuka1
stuka1

@RevBF 

55%+ of Coloradans, 66%+ of Denverites is a "subculture?"

HipTip: Westword covers quite a bit more ground than High Times. hth

Now Trending

Denver Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

Loading...