Fountain Lady strikes back, and five other unbelievably stupid lawsuits

Categories: Popular Culture

fountain lady.jpg
Help! I did something stupid!
Cathy Cruz Marrero, the Pennsylvania woman now famous for starring in a viral video -- wherein she falls into a fountain at the Berkshire Mall while texting -- appeared on Good Morning America with her attorney, James Polyak, yesterday. Marrero and pal Polyak are currently pursuing a possible lawsuit against, well, they're not entirely sure.

So we'll help them out: Marrero will be suing a mall for being caught doing something stupid. And oddly enough, when she does, she'll be staking her place in a rich history of people doing exactly that.

What damages Marrero will eventually seek are yet to be announced. First, Polyak and Marrero need to establish liability -- the head of security, Polyak hinted to George Stephanopoulos during another TV appearance, must have allowed someone to record the original security footage of Marrero's textacular dive with a cellphone. Assuming the investigation uncovers that tidbit, Polyak will, most likely, have to prove that the head of security was aware that the footage would be republished on YouTube. Of course, this is all based on a best-case scenario for Marrero and Polyak. Without the complicit high-profile employee (if a head of mall security can be thought of in such terms), there's no case. It's Berkshire's money they want, not Phil the security guard who must have had the best day ever once he stumbled upon Marrero's swan dive.

Sounds complicated, but it's not the longest-shot lawsuit ever. Not, in fact, by a long shot.

After searching through piles of false frivolity -- the Internet is full of bullshit urban legends about ridiculous litigation -- here's a look at the top five most unbelievable civil lawsuits that actually happened.

Number 5.jpg
Exhibit A: Since when are weathermen expected to be infallible?
In what ultimately ended in a shocking victory, an Israeli woman sued a weatherman over a miscalculation. The weatherman predicted sunshine. The woman left the house wearing something light and airy. Unfortunately, it rained. She was drenched, caught the flu and missed 4 days of work. She asked for $1,000 and won.

So did the plaintiff's advocate also definitively prove the connection between being wet and being susceptible to unwanted pathogens? Isn't this a simple case of that old Latin gem post hoc ergo propter hoc? Guess not.

How did this affect future case law for Israel? Well, if you happen to meet someone while dancing, sleep with them sans kosher condom and contract AIDS. Then you'll have grounds to sue the party who invited you to the club. L'chaim!

Number 4.jpg
Exhibit B: Lookalike looks like an idiot
In my more formative years, I have had the occasional passerby tell me I looked like either Zack Galifianakis or Robert Downey Jr. Don't see a similarity between them? Me neither. This comparison either irritated or electrified me, depending on whom I was identified as, but I never thought to punish those famous men for having the slightest resemblance to your humble author.

That's what separates me from Allen Heckard -- well, that and he's black.

Heckard of Portland, Ore., filed a suit against Michael Jordan for "defamation and permanent injury as well as emotional pain and suffering." For what, you might ask? Heckard claimed that people were always telling him he looked like Jordan. That's it.

This downtrodden doppelganger was asking for $416 million in damages from Jordan and an additional $416 million in damages from Phil Knight, the founder of Nike. According to Heckard, Knight directly contributed to Jordan's fame by issuing the Air Jordan, a shoe that Heckard admitted to wearing.

Eventually, the case was dismissed, but not after both Jordan's and Nike's legal teams had to assemble, answer the suit, and in a collective sigh, face Heckard, who is six inches shorter, eight years older and at least $832 million poorer than Jordan.


My Voice Nation Help
9 comments
yahoo-YKD3TJKNTU2ZL4YXMQCRBS5KLQ
yahoo-YKD3TJKNTU2ZL4YXMQCRBS5KLQ

She's a con-artist with a shady past. No sane person would expose themselves to this much publicity over something this embarrassing.

She's in it for whatever money she can make off of it.

scottstyris
scottstyris

She will end up with a couple hundred grand and when someone posts it up in OT we will all vomit and get real pissy knowing that Earth is in deep clinton and there is not much we can do about it.We must enforce sanctions under Rule 11 much more harshly, instead of assuming that being laughed out of court is a good enough deterrent for frivolous lawsuits. This is where it must start.

DSTT

tim davids
tim davids

And would you believe I spelled Kindergarten wrong on purpose to lull you into a false sense of security?

dr. angelface
dr. angelface

marrero's a lowrent con artist. she's got a bunch of convictions for things like identity theft and credit card fraud, which she owes a lot of restitution money on. she WORKS in that mall. this is all just a setup for litigation.

post hoc fallacy is typically expressed as "post hoc, ergo proptEr hoc," unless your latin skills are roughly equivalent to j.k.rowling's (i.e. much vaunted but functionally nonexistent), in which case you probably shouldn't be using latin.

it's something i sincerely wish everyone had drilled into them from age Kindergarten, since so many people nowadays canNOT seem to assimilate the differences between correlation and causation. but that's me.

tim davids
tim davids

Why is Kindergarden the only proper noun here? Is it lauded deservedly, unlike J.K. Rowling?

Show and Tell Moderator
Show and Tell Moderator

"Low-rent" is typically hyphenated, Dr. Angelface, if you want to get technical, but thanks for pointing out that we made a spelling error in a dead language in the most condescending way possible. It has been corrected.

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

Denver Event Tickets
Loading...