Say "goodbye" to Instagram -- and six other Internet goals for 2013

2013: The year we stopped freaking out over our own lack of concern for Internet privacy.
It's that time of year when we start to let go of what has happened over the last twelve months and look forward to doing things in a better way over the next twelve. Or if you're like me, it's just that time before the total hysteria of another year sets in and you proceed to re-up your diet pills, charge your crystals and pray to god(s)/Magic 8-ball that someone digs up a husband for you.

Anyway, inspired by the suggestion of words that need to be retired in 2013, here's a list of Internet-related things that should also cease to exist in the coming year, and make our virtual world a slightly better (if not less irritating) place.

See also:
- Wanna keep track of your Lenten guilt? There's an App for that.
- Five toys for girls that need a gender makeover
- I'm giving up money and sugar in 2012. What are your resolutions?

7. Using Twitter as a news source and Facebook as a human database
I know, not doing this seems impossible. Especially as Twitter has taken over as the way up-to-the-minute information is disseminated to the public in times of crisis. But when a news anchor quotes a random person's Twitter account as the source for information -- or worse, uses Twitter itself to share incorrect information and Facebook to gather photographs -- unverified data travels fast. Which is why the wrong individual was initially named in the recent Newtown tragedy.

At some point in the near future, it would rule if there were a way to quickly and accurately verify information as it was being spread. But for the time being, it is important to remember something: anyone can have a Twitter account. Famous dead rappers have Twitter accounts. Political gaffes -- Binders of Women, anyone? -- have Twitter accounts. Aziz Ansari's tweenage cousin Harris has a Twitter account with more than 26,000 followers. I'm not saying these accounts aren't trustworthy*, I'm just saying.

*However, if you get all of your news from Buzzfeed, I will trust you.

NicoleBrownSimpson.jpg
I don't even know where to start.
6. Creating social/political statements with memes if you can't use the very Internet you're posting within to spell/fact check the information first
I've already rallied against the stupidity of memes in general, and how disappointed I am in my otherwise intelligent friends haphazardly reposting these idiotic, misinformed pieces of art-news on Facebook. But seriously. Make it stop. Or at least do a simple google search of the proposed "facts" you're trying to convey before posting commentary about gun control -- when a case (like the one used in the meme above) involves a fatal stabbing.

TaylorSwiftThisisExhausting.jpg
Another sensational headline? Like T. Swift says, this is exhausting.
5. Writing sensational headlines that battle The Onion's in legitimacy
Granted, legitimate news stories involving politicians saying things like "If it's a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down" made actual headlines read like sensational ones, but there was a point in the midst of 2012's "legitimate rape-gate" at which it felt out of control. While the Todd Akins, Richard Mourdocks and Ron Pauls of the political world provided the fodder for Onion-like stories, there were still plenty of "Panel of rape supporters supports rapist's story of not-raping!" -type headlines that read like dramatic Facebook updates.

Meaning, readers couldn't even get to the lede without the publication/blog making up our minds for us. Just because journalism now happens on the Internet doesn't mean there are no rules. Can we maybe save all of the OMGs and WTFs of the written word for the copy, and at least leave headlines alone? It's the only part of an article anyone reads these days, anyway.

Continue reading for more Internet don'ts.


Sponsor Content

My Voice Nation Help
1 comments
Corrections
Corrections

Bree, I love love love your writing, but I think you misinterpreted the Nicole Brown Simpson meme that is posted on the first page. 

This meme is in response to what Bob Costas said during a Monday Night Football broadcast in response to the Jovan Belcher murder-suicide. What Costas said was that Belcher's girlfriend was dead because Belcher had access to guns. I think he might have actually said that she'd definitely be alive if he had not had a gun. This meme is saying that Costas is wrong because OJ did not need access to a gun to kill Nicole and so it makes perfect sense - despite being pretty annoying. 

If you don't replace this meme soon, someone is going to point out that you failed to google the facts surrounding a meme in a post wherein you chide people for not googling facts of a meme.

Now Trending

Denver Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

Loading...